A reorganisation plan means the document in which an employer explains why and how the organisation will change, which roles will change or disappear, and what this means for employees. A strong plan combines the business rationale with a practical people-impact approach, including redeployment and support options. This is where it directly connects to outplacement: the plan determines who becomes redundant, what support is appropriate, and how to organise a careful transition to new work. Below you will find the essential building blocks, the Dutch legal context, and practical examples.
A reorganisation plan only works if it is both strategic and executable. Strategic, because you must be able to explain the necessity and goals of the change; executable, because managers, HR and employees need clarity on what happens and when. In the Netherlands, the content typically aligns with what is needed for works council consultation and, if applicable, an UWV route for dismissals on economic grounds.
Start with the rationale and objectives, then translate these into roles, headcount and concrete consequences. Specify which departments, locations or processes will change. Next, describe which roles will disappear, which new roles will be created, and which skills are required. This prevents the plan from becoming an abstract document without operational value.
Practical example: a care organisation centralises workforce scheduling. The plan states that three local planner roles will end and one central planning pool will be created. It then sets out who is redeployable, what training is needed (for example a new planning system), and what support is offered when redeployment fails, such as an outplacement programme.
A reorganisation plan does not stand alone. When a reorganisation has employee impact, employee participation matters: the works council may have advisory rights under the Dutch Works Councils Act. A plan that is clear about necessity, alternatives and consequences supports a meaningful consultation process with the works council and reduces delays caused by ambiguity.
If dismissal for economic reasons becomes necessary, UWV expects a coherent and verifiable rationale: have roles genuinely ceased to exist, is the new structure implemented consistently, and has redeployment been properly explored. While there is no single mandatory “template” called a reorganisation plan, in practice it functions as the backbone of the evidence file. Ensure role profiles, headcount figures and decision-making records are aligned.
A social plan is commonly the agreement with unions and/or employee representation about employment consequences. The reorganisation plan and the social plan should reinforce each other: the plan explains what changes; the social plan sets the measures. In practice, outplacement, training budgets and mobility arrangements are often captured in the social plan, while the reorganisation plan focuses on execution and timing.
Outplacement becomes relevant when internal redeployment is no longer feasible. A reorganisation plan that embeds outplacement well prevents ad-hoc decisions: it clarifies eligibility, start moments and intended outcomes upfront. This gives employees perspective and provides managers with a clear route for difficult conversations.
Define how mobility will work: first redeployment, then external job search support. Also describe how you handle differences between roles and employees without creating unfairness. Think of tailored intensity (for example more support for employees with a narrower labour market position) within predefined, transparent boundaries.
Concrete scenario: an employee is informed their role will cease. The plan states an internal redeployment period with defined search steps and meetings. If no suitable role is found, outplacement in a reorganisation starts within an agreed timeframe, avoiding prolonged uncertainty. Support becomes part of the process, not an afterthought.
An executable reorganisation plan translates policy into actions: who does what, when, with which documents and according to which decision criteria. That requires clear phasing and a limited set of key choices. Use one leading process so HR, management and communications apply the same sequence and definitions.
Use clear definitions: “redundant” (the role ends), “redeployable” (a realistic chance of a suitable internal role), “suitable role” (matching education, experience and level, with reasonable training time). Defining jargon immediately prevents debates that are really about terminology. Align this with your collective labour agreement or internal policies to keep the plan consistent.
Sample wording that makes the plan concrete: “The redeployment period lasts X weeks; during this period at least two suitable roles are actively offered or a refusal is substantiated.” and “If redeployment is unsuccessful, external mobility support is initiated, including agreements on time and availability.” Combine this with an approach to employee communication so timing and content match.
Finally, assign one owner for progress (often HR) and document how exceptions are handled. That supports consistent decision-making and prevents individual cases from putting the entire reorganisation under pressure. For a clear sequence of choices, it helps to align with a practical reorganisation step-by-step plan, so the plan works in execution as well as on paper.
Hoofdkantoor
Care4Careers B.V.
2801 ND Gouda
Achter de Vismarkt 78
Sales & Post Office
Eigenhaardweg 8
7811 LR Emmen
The local branches are in:
- Amsterdam
- Breda
- Eindhoven
- Emmen
- The Hague
- Gouda
- Groningen
- Hengelo
- Leeuwarden
- Maastricht
- Nijmegen
- Rotterdam
- Utrecht
- Flushing
- Zwolle
Want to make an appointment at one of our locations?
Contact our head office.